|
Seeing Sullivan
Author Tricia Sullivan interviewed about her stunning new work
of future-fiction, Maul, and why some may fine her imagined world
extremely disturbing.
Was there any one event or thought that
sparked the novel?
TS:
The girlz-in-the-mall strand of the story just came out
of nowhere; I wrote the first passage back in 1995 as a lark and
surprised myself: I mean, what kind of girl masturbates with a gun?
So I kept telling myself the story to find out what would happen
next. But the problem was that there was no SF crunch to this thing,
and I just couldn't get interested in doing it as a 'straight' novel.
Around this time I was also thinking, wouldn't it be fun to do some
sort of twisted response to Sheri S. Tepper's THE GATE TO WOMEN'S
COUNTRY, which contained the fascinating idea of an apparently male-dominated
culture that was, in truth, anything but.
I had a short story from back in 1993 called 'Pink', about a
chemist in prison (because it has been predicted he'll invent a
chemical formula that will revolutionize the world) and his jailor,
Starry Eyes. I sent it to Analog but they wrote back that it was
too dark, and I knew it hadn't quite gelled, anyway. I still had
feelings for these two guys, though, so I decided to make them both
prisoners in a female-dominated future - you know, the old, 'men
wiped out by deadly virus' scenario.
I liked the way the two tests rubbed against each other, but the
real work then came in figuring out why they needed to be juxtaposed.
Did you have particular themes in mind
before you began writing, or did they evolve with the story?
TS: I had the image of Meniscus
being painted blue right from the get-go, but I didn't know what
that was about. I started reading about evolutionary biology, and
I was reading some microbiology for DREAMING IN SMOKE (I actually
stole all the Picasso's Blues stuff that appears in DREAMING IN
SMOKE from MAUL because I need something nifty to use in DREAMING),
and I started thinking about co-evolution and the relationship between
multicellulars (us) and single-celled organisms (the bugs) and how
that relationship has shaped human development.
It's the idea that the organism doesn't have to be sentient in
any way we would recognize in order to produce behavior that is
sentient. It's a bit like those optical illusions where you don't
know if you're looking at a black vase on a white background, or
two white faces kissing against a black background.
You can look at human behavior from the point of view of this
intricate chemical dance among micro-organisms. I guess I am always
interested in the mind/body problem and in the idea of psychophysical
transformation, so that naturally came to the fore as I was going
along. I was doing a lot of martial arts training while the early
drafts were forming, and my then-teacher, now-partner, Steve Morris,
had told me about the importance of visual impressions in determining
physical response.
He could also control his pulse and body temperature and stuff
like that - sans mysticism - and he introduced me to a whole body
of information on neurochemistry and its effect on behavior - especially
combative, aggressive behavior. I put that together with the sentient
bugs and I was on my way.
The scenes in the near-future mall, and
the girls' behaviour is extremely convincing - are your own mall-hanging
memories an influence here? And is there maybe a tiny bit of wish
fulfilment in the carnage that ensues?!
TS: I didn't mall-hang all that
much, and my friends and I were most determinedly non-cool. If there
is wish-fulfillment going on here, it lies in the characters of
Sun and her friends, who are a whole lot more plugged-in than I
ever was (or will be!). Carnage-wise, I guess I still carry a lot
of frustration from my adolescence and - OK, what the hell, it WAS
cathartic to write those scenes!
The far-future story is, at times, extremely
disturbing and raises questions about the longevity of the human
race - do you think we are a doomed species?
TS: I never saw doom in the future
of the Meniscus story. I saw a far-future (if it is a future, which
is not necessarily the case if you read the book) in which people
might acquire the ability to connect their ideas with their physical
form. Become like comic-book heroes. Have special powers. Do wild,
imaginative things.
You could say that's just a metaphor for what's already happening,
from body pierces to tattoos to plastic surgery to genetic engineering
and so on and on. Or you could say it's something innate in us.
We can transform our environment; why wouldn't we want to transform
ourselves? And since our central nervous system already does that
for us - in infancy, in adolescence, in pregnancy, in ageing - why
not get the master keys to the inner kingdom?
Of course, lots of SF has dealt with the transformation of the
species. Nanotech is all over the place these days. But I wanted
to get into the crack between what we set out to do and what actually
happens. As a species, we might be scientists, but we are also animals,
and we're moved by drives and desires we don't understand.
In the Meniscus strand of this story, humanity has been shaped
by the very organisms it's trying to design. I try to subvert the
cliché of 'killer virus runs amok' and look instead at the diolog
between subject and object.
I try to look at the dilog between parasite and host, which is,
incidentally, very much the same dialog as that between the conscious
and unconscious mind. I found myself playing with all of these dichotomies.
But it isn't really about the future, remember! It's about now.
And, on a rather lighter note: if you
could buy anything from the mall in your novel, what would it be?
(I've heard pink ammo-belts are the must-have just now...)
TS: As the mother of a 19-month
old boy, I could really use a pair of Energy boots from Miles Mocassins.
And maybe a Patience belt or something.
What are you reading at the moment?
TS: Nothing. I'm writing.
Who do you regard as the ones to watch
in SF?
TS: Justina Robson and John Courtenay
Grimwood. Everybody's already watching folks like Mike Harrison
and China Mieville, not to mention scads of others - SF in Britain
is superb these days.
What can fans look forward to from you
after Maul?
TS: I'm doing this thing called
Cookie Starfishing. It's set partly in 1980's New Jersey and partly
on another planet. I said this at a reading recently and somebody
in the audience guffawed. 'Isn't that the same thing?' he said.
Wise guy.
Thanks to Orbit Books (and Ben Sharpe) for permission
to post this interview. For more details of their SFF authors and
books, visit Orbit at www.orbitbooks.co.uk
|