|
Star Trek Enterprise: The Seventh
T'Pol asks Archer along on a classified mission which threatens
to reveal an incident she has long hidden from herself.
"The
Seventh" Enterprise Season 2, Episode 7 Written by Rick Berman
& Brannon Braga Directed by David Livingston
I'm
starting to have the sinking feeling that "Minefield"
and "Dead Stop" were the flukes of the season. Here we
are, seven episodes into the season, and the episodes sitting at
the "ho-hum" level or lower are outnumbering the interesting
ones. That's not an encouraging sign.

In fairness, "The
Seventh" isn't nearly as weak a show as some of its recent
predecessors. It's not as horrifically unfunny as "A Night
in Sickbay" or as baldfacedly generic as "Marauders."
"The Seventh" has some interesting material at its core,
which is of itself an improvement - the concerns this time are more
related to the path taken to reach some of that material.
One of the main goals
here seems to be giving T'Pol a dark past. We discover early on
that she used to work as part of the Ministry of Security and had
at one time a mission to bring in Vulcan undercover operatives who
refused to return to Vulcan after finishing their duties.
She missed one at
the time, however - one who has only just been found, thus giving
T'Pol an opportunity (and an order) to finish what she once began.
Unfortunately, a part of that past has been excised from her memory:
after killing Menos' partner and being unable to tolerate the feelings
of guilt and remorse, she underwent an ancient ritual that let her
simply forget that little event happened.
For the most part,
that's all well and good. I find it a little distressing when characters
are given a dark past in lieu of an interesting present, but I've
no real problem with the idea of T'Pol essentially being someone
who used to do special ops. There are certainly story possibilities
that can spin out of such a move, and there's no obvious conflict
inherent in giving her that job.
However, I have a
lot of problems with it being used as the premise for this particular
assignment. When Archer asks why T'Pol has to be the one to finish
this assignment, her response is that the Ministry of Security "considers
it a point of honor." "How very Vulcan," muses Archer.
Well, Jon ... no.
How very Klingon, perhaps - but Vulcan? Vulcans will go with
the logical and efficient solution, not one that lets someone avenge
a past injustice. And in this case, the logical choice is to avoid
using T'Pol at all costs. Why? Well, here are the top two reasons:
- Menos knows what
she looks like, since she nearly apprehended him once before. Send
someone from an allied race who can get close without being recognized.
- Since it's evident
from later in the episode that T'Pol still has a lot of unresolved
trauma from her previous attempt to apprehend Menos, it's criminal
stupidity to send her back out there where Menos can play head games
with her and get away again. Even if we accept that the Vulcans
didn't know that T'Pol's "therapy" would break down, they
knew that she'd had problems beforehand. So don't send her!
The unfortunate thing
is that there's a very good reason for sending T'Pol that remains
completely unspoken: if it's taken seventeen years to track Menos
to ground, simply make it so that Enterprise is the only ship in
the neighborhood. If T'Pol is the only person with a chance of apprehending
Menos before he moves on again, then you've got a good reason
for sending her and an equally good reason for the Vulcans to do
so only reluctantly. As it is, the logic looks entirely too tortured
to justify the premise.
As long as we're on
difficult things to swallow, did anyone out there buy even for an
instant that Menos is a surgically altered Vulcan who's refused
to come home? I certainly didn't, and there was no real reason to
make him that in the first place. If he's a fugitive that the Vulcans
want for some reason, that should be sufficient reason in and of
itself.
Call me old-fashioned,
but if he's a Vulcan I think he ought to exhibit at least one
Vulcan trait, be it a physical trait like strength or a mental one
like a relentlessly good analytical mind. Menos showed none of those
- he was good at playing on emotions, yes, but apart from that he's
got more in common with Hannibal Lecter than he does with any Vulcan
I've ever seen.
Let's keep in mind
that he didn't even have any clue how T'Pol could have 'forgotten'
the ritual that let her remove her memories. This is another part
of the premise that raises lots of plausibility questions without
adding anything to the story in the process.
Having said all that,
once you put all that aside and simply accept the premise as a given,
most of the show works reasonably well. At its heart, it's a psychological
duel between Menos and Archer with T'Pol as the middleman: Menos
plays on T'Pol's doubt and fears about what happened on Risa, while
Archer continually reminds her that she's here to apprehend Menos
and return him to Vulcan, not to play judge and jury herself.
It's a dynamic that's
certainly appeared in many other places and times, but in this case
that's because it's a dynamic that carries a lot of meat: even as
telegraphed as some of the ending was, seeing Archer in the snow
effectively talking T'Pol into shooting Menos down had a certain
visceral appeal.
A lot of the episode's
successes can be firmly laid at the feet of Bruce Davison (Menos).
He may not have been a remotely convincing Vulcan, but I see that
as more a choice than a fault - because he did convince quite
nicely as a master manipulator. Menos made a few dumb choices which
were possibly out of panic (such as firing at Archer in the bar
when he was first apprehended), but once he realized that he had
T'Pol had a disadvantage when it came to knowledge and to emotional
control, he exploited it for all it was worth.
I got the feeling
that he was initially trying to bring Archer and Mayweather over
to his side, then switched to T'Pol when he saw that she was a more
effective target. In nearly every scene after Jossen's death is
finally brought to light, Menos harps on T'Pol having "killed
an innocent man" and implies that bringing him in will be every
bit as much of a death sentence as the one she carried out herself.
It may not be the
masterpiece of manipulation that, for example, Garak exhibited with
Sisko in DS9's "In the Pale Moonlight," but I'm not sure
there's a character anywhere on the Trek roster who can match Garak
for sheer guile ... and even being reminded of such an example speaks
somewhat well of the Menos/T'Pol interplay.
Given my past reviews,
you're probably expecting that I'll now say that Bruce Davison did
an especially good job compared to Jolene Blalock. Surprise: I actually
thought she did a decent job through most of the episode. Granted,
the "I said STOP TALKING!" line that we got in the preview
ranks as one of the worst line readings of the season, but it was
also an exception: Blalock plays "haunted" reasonably
well.
Writing for T'Pol
must be an interesting challenge at this point, since all evidence
suggests that Blalock plays the aftermath of trauma well
while falling down when it comes to exhibiting the trauma itself
- I wouldn't want to have to write for that combination myself,
but that's why I'm not on staff. :-) (Well, that and many other
reasons...)
The "twist"
ending, where it turns out that Menos is in fact smuggling biological
toxins, was something of a mixed bag. I suppose it'd be more difficult
to actually make T'Pol responsible for an innocent man's death,
but in principle that's the only real down side - and Davison did
a great job switching from playing the wounded innocent to someone
substantially more calculating and cold-blooded.
On the other hand,
the ending suffered a bit in execution, since Our Heroes had to
act like fairly serious idiots in letting Menos get away during
the final firefight. So far as I can tell, when he's proven this
calculating and this slippery, as soon as he gives up you stun him
and be done with it: that's why you have the damned stun
setting, guys.
As a "bring back
Menos" story of psychological warfare, then, "The Seventh"
wasn't bad. I have trouble tying any of it to Vulcan, and have the
nasty sensation to boot that Vulcan is being made into far more
of a dystopian society than I'm even remotely comfortable with,
but in and of itself the main plot was okay.
Meanwhile, back on
the ship, our time was completely wasted by watching Trip learn
that being acting captain means more than special lunches in the
captain's mess. The big Trip/Phlox/Reed scene ran almost three minutes,
and was worth maybe a third of that time. Bleah.
Some other observations:
- Editing glitch:
at one point, Menos is referred to as "Mai-nos" and "Mee-nos"
only a sentence apart. I can understand when different actors will
read names a little differently, but in this case it was the same
actor a single sentence apart. Sheesh.
- Kudos for tying
P'Jem into T'Pol's memory purge. If you're going to purge memories
from your mind, a hidden recon base is probably a good place. :-)
(Actually, it also begs the question of whether T'Pol might have
seen something *there* she shouldn't have as well and had that purged
at the same time. Could be interesting.)
- So T'Pol underwent
the "falara" ritual to purge the memories of Jossen's
death from her mind. All well and good ... but since "Fusion"
already established that Vulcans of this time don't know about mind-melds,
does anyone else wonder how such a ritual would even be possible?
- Boy, that "you
can't go out, the deck is covered with acid" tease evaporated
awfully quickly, didn't it? Menos' big escape attempt comes only
minutes after T'Pol returns, and the implication is that the deck
was still dangerous as of the time she came back.
- Note to smugglers:
when shipping dangerous biological toxins, be sure to put them in
transparent containers so that everyone can see the Really Cool
Bright Green Glowing Stuff That Doesn't Raise Any Suspicions At
All. Mm-hmm.
That's probably about
it. "The Seventh" is a step up from "Marauders"
and "A Night in Sickbay" simply by the virtue of not making
as many mistakes, but I'm still getting the ugly feeling that "Minefield"
and "Dead Stop" were the exceptions and not the norm.
Here's hoping I've proved wrong as soon and as often as possible.
So, wrapping up:
Writing: A decent core with lots of horrible
plot contrivances to get there.
Direction: Nothing especially striking one way or the other.
Acting:
Kudos to Davison; Blalock was uneven, but positive on the whole.
OVERALL:
5.5. Just enough meat to come out ahead of "dead neutral."
Tim Lynch
Copyright 2002, Timothy W. Lynch.
This article is explicitly prohibited from being used in any off-net
compilation without due attribution and express written consent
of the author. Walnut Creek and other CD-ROM distributors, take
note.
|