|
Van Helsing: Mark's Take
Not as bad as it might have been, but still no bargain. This is
a fast-paced and overblown CGI-fest that leverages off of the old
Universal monsters but does not actually want to use them. Writer-director
Steven Sommers of the 'Mummy' films handles action scenes well, but
is poor with directing acting or even giving us a very good story.
This is a film of dubious thrills and no chills whatsoever.
You
can tell everything you need to know about Van Helsing from the
poster. The name VAN HELSING conjures up images from the novel DRACULA.
Two actors have owned the role enough to play it more than once.
One is Edward Van Sloan, and the other Peter Cushing--both of them
advanced years and rarely physical. The original character uses
his brains, not his brawn. The poster shows him jazzed up, young,
and recast as an action hero to appeal to a teenage audience. There
is little attempt to make him consistent with the character as written.
That transform on the character is really the essence of what director
Stephen Sommers has done with the entire film. The teenage audience
does not want a hero who thinks and solves puzzles like how to track
down a vampire.
They want a hero with big futuristic weapons who can fight CGI
villains. And they want the monsters to be equally physical. Sommers
previously jazzed up the old Boris Karloff mummy Im-ho-tep and made
of him the CGI mummy who was monstrous in all the wrong ways.
He showed he could make a computer-aided monster movie and give
it an air of respectability by trading off a traditional Universal
Studios monster. Now he has moved on to do a film like HOUSE OF
FRANKENSTEIN and HOUSE OF DRACULA but with 21st century comic book
sensibilities (or lack thereof), tailored for those kids who believe
black-and-white films cause eyestrain.
If you don't have a poster, everything you need to know about VAN
HELSING you can learn by considering his crossbow. It fires bolts
like a machine gun. It has a rocket launcher. And it has a bow with
a taut bowstring. Why does it need a bow? Well the story takes place
in the late-1800s and they don't want to damage the period feel.
Not much, they don't. Of course the women's fashions are skimpy
and revealing. I guess that is what clothing was like in Victorian
times.
As the story opens Van Helsing (Hugh Jackman, just a tad bland
for an action hero) is fighting to subdue Dr. Jekyll's evil side,
Edward Hyde. Except this Edward Hyde is big like a rubbery- looking
Incredible Hulk. Van Helsing dispatches him and that done he returns
to Rome. It seems that Van Helsing is a sort of James Bond for a
secret organization in the Vatican.
Van Helsing gets his orders from Cardinal Jinette. This film's
token distinguished actor Alun Armstrong plays the cardinal. (Armstrong's
weasel-like looks get him great villainous roles like Thenardier
from LES MISERABLES and Wackford Squeers from NICHOLAS NICKLEBY.
Here we see far too little of him.) Once Van Helsing is fitted out
with new weapons by the Vatican's equivalent of Q he is dispatched
to Transylvania to fight a threat from Count Dracula who has a plot
for vampirism to break out as an epidemic in a big way.
He is given a friar Carl (David Wenham) as his humorous sidekick.
(Aren't all sidekicks humorous?) Intentionally or not Van Helsing
and Carl seem to be recreation of the heroes of CAPTAIN KRONOS,
VAMPIRE HUNTER.
Sommers superficially ties his current fantasy creations into the
old Universal monster movies, but with little respect for the originals.
It is something of a forced fit. In the original Dracula had the
power to move about unseen by turning into a bat. Sommers reinvents
this power saying Dracula and his brides can transform themselves
into bat-winged harpies who attack from the air and have little
interest in hiding themselves.
It is a complete subversion of the original concept of what a
vampire is. The new wolf man is the size of a bear like in THE HOWLING,
and borrowing an idea from Paul Schrader's CAT PEOPLE (1982), the
human does not transform into the animal but the creature bursts
from inside the human's skin and presumably leaves a human skin
laying around.
Everything is done at a fast pace with one action scene after another
to cover over the paucity of plotting. Kate Beckinsale in tight
swashbuckling clothes seems rather extraneous to the plot, but she
is usually a pleasure to see on the screen.
This is a CGI action-fest rip-off and wannabe from a parallel universe
where LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN was an enviable success.
Perhaps the film will be a critical success in that world. VAN HELSING
gets a 0 on the -4 to +4 scale or 4/10.
As a side note, Universal Home Video has released what they call
Legacy Collections of their Dracula, Frankenstein, and werewolf
films. The timing suggests the relatively good price for the classic
films is intended to use them as a throwaway promotion for VAN HELSING
(!).
After Carl Laemmle, Jr., left Universal the studio never again
showed proper respect their horror series and this continues that
tradition. The werewolf set includes four classic werewolf films;
the other two have five films each.
Together they represent all the series films of the three monsters
with the exception of ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN. Over
the years I had lovingly collected individually VHS copies each
of these 14 films (okay, 13 of them).
I am happy to get them all at a reasonable price at the quality
of DVD reproduction. I am a little sorry to see them dispensed as
mere "bonus features." It is one more case of tails wagging dogs.
Mark R. Leeper
Copyright 2004 Mark R. Leeper
|
|
OTHER CONTENT - June 2004
|
Neal
Asher Interview
Psychologically disturbed android killing machines. A Beast that harvests people
to research its genetic dabbling across time by sending them back to the primordial
ages. A mysterious Japanese man still living millennia after Hiroshima. A physicist
that uses nanotechnology to merge with a spacecraft. Welcome to the weird and
wonderful world of Neal Asher.
(INTERVIEWS)
Big
Ben
Ben Jeapes interviewed. The author speaks about penning cracking reads like
'His Majesty's Starship' , the differences between writing SF for the young
adult market and the 'grown-up' sector, and the sadness of shutting the doors
at his own publishing house, Big Engine.
(INTERVIEWS)
Just
a Tad More
If Tad Williams' Memory, Sorrow & Thorn series is "the fantasy equivalent of
War and Peace" (Locus magazine), then Tad must be Fantasy's Leo Tolstoy. The
prolific Mr Williams is cornered for some vodka and a chat.
(INTERVIEWS)
Bruce
on Bruce
The father of cyberpunk - or at the very least the Uncle - Bruce Sterling, chats
about his new technothriller, The Zenith Angle, with real-life security expert
Bruce Schneier.
(INTERVIEWS)
Forty
Whacks
Scots SF author Ken Macleod visits sunny Spain for the second installment of
'Stitch and Split: Selves and Territories in Science Fiction', in Seville, sponsored
by the Universidad Internacional de Andalucia. Take a walk with Ken down the
Latin road to SFF.
(COMMENT)
Eight
Days in Zagreb
Our jetsetting Scots SF author Ken Macleod flies out to Croatia as a guest at
the Sferakon convention. He finds the old world of Yugoslav science fiction
intriguing, from the pulp cover translations of Western SF novels to state-sponsored
SFF societies.
(COMMENT)
The
Weird Tale of 'Pulgasari'
Mark takes a look at the fantasy film Pulgasari; featuring a beast which was
a North Korean giant monster who ate iron and grew to hundreds of feet high.
It's director was kidnapped from South Korea, taken to North Korea, imprisoned
for four years with no explanation, and then forced to make the only Marxist
monster movie.
(ARTICLES)
Godsend
In Godsend, Frank finds a run-of-the-mill child-cloning thriller turned into
a flaccid frightfest that is all clumsy thumbs, and no controllable finger to
decisively point this devilish dud of a movie in the right creative direction.
(FILM REVIEWS)
Shrek
2: Frank's Take
In Shrek 2, we are gleefully reunited with the amiable pot-bellied giant and
his colorful crew of supporters that include his new wife Princess Fiona (Cameron
Diaz) and his old sidekick Donkey (Eddie Murphy).
(FILM REVIEWS)
Shrek
2: Mark's Take
There is distinctly less magic and fun in Shrek 2 as the title ogre has problems
becoming accepted by his in-laws. All the same cast is back with the same voices,
but the tone of the film is darker and we don't learn a lot more about the characters
that we liked in the first film.
(FILM REVIEWS)
Van
Helsing: Mark's Take
Not as bad as it might have been, but still no bargain. This is a fast-paced
and overblown CGI-fest that leverages off of the old Universal monsters but
does not actually want to use them. Writer-director Steven Sommers of the 'Mummy'
films handles action scenes well, but is poor with directing acting or even
giving us a very good story. This is a film of dubious thrills and no chills
whatsoever.
(FILM REVIEWS)
Van
Helsing: Frank's Take
In this film, our Frank finds an exceedingly glossy but empty-headed thrill-seeking
monsters mash mishap that boasts competent big-budgeted special effects but
little else.
(FILM REVIEWS)
Eternal
Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Mark uncovers quite probably the best new science fiction film he has seen since
Minority Report and well before. A device allows for the removal of painful
memories by erasing them. The hitch is that the memories must be opened and
partially relived as they are being erased. Charlie Kaufman's third script is
demanding, but it is delightfully engaging, intelligent, and even profound.
(FILM REVIEWS)
Troy
Despite the showcasing of buff bodies clashing with conviction in this historic
sword and sandals fable, Troy is an elaborate action-adventure yearning to sweep
the moviegoer off their feet but the uneven rhythms sullies its energized scope.
(FILM REVIEWS)
Offworld
Report June 2004: Science Fiction and Fantasy
Interviews with Peter Crowther, Steven Brust, John Jarrold, Neil Gaiman and
the stars of Van Helsing; JG Ballard considers disaster movies, Stephen Baxter
dishes the dirt on the writing secrets of SF, and Octavia Butler ponders the
nature of power.
(NEWS)
Offworld
Report June 2004: Weird Science
The Pentagon's science fiction weapons program (railgun warships, anyone?),
space tugs, a robot built out of DNA, NASA's wilder dreams, the fantasy folk
seen in Scotland, and why we should be begging China for a decent space race.
(NEWS)
|

CHAT
ABOUT THIS STORY
Advertise
Here (More ...)
|